Last Sunday, the Basel Committee, the international body responsible for developing the operating rules of the banking industry, announced the requirements that apply to the future. The standards, including the implementation will run through 2018 have been considerably strengthened, with the explicit aim of avoiding another financial crisis. President of the French Banking Federation (FBF) from 1 September, the boss of BPCE François Perol reacts to this event on behalf of the profession.
LE FIGARO. – What the French banks feared-that is to say an excessive strengthening of the requirements of their regulators, has it occurred last Sunday during the meeting of the Basel Committee?
Francis PEROLS. – The strengthening of capital adequacy of banks is necessary. The rest was an instruction to regulators by the Heads of State and Government of the G20.What was decided on Sunday is the translation of this commitment, in a version very demanding. Judge for yourself: in practice, the minimum capital that a bank must be multiplied by more than 5 by the new regulations. Indeed, not only the minimum ratio of capital raised from 2% to 7% risk, but also the definition of capital that can be taken into account in calculating this ratio is made more restrictive. In total, this will greatly increase the amount of capital that banks must be equipped.
How, in the case of French banks?
The French banks did not wait for new regulations to strengthen their capital. Since the crisis, they have increased their capital over 30% on average to be placed well above the minimum required by current regulations.This is why the French banks are already solid banks, as demonstrated resistance tests that Europe has made in July. And their model is robust enough that the capital requirement set by Basel 3 may be filled by setting aside a portion of their results. Regulators have indeed had the wisdom to give us enough time for that …
So where is the problem?
All things being equal, have more capital for the same activities, it means more pressure on the risks we take, therefore, on credit, and the profitability of these risks and therefore on interest rates . The risk is therefore a credit less dynamic and more expensive. I would add that the work of regulators are not completed.It remains to further clarify the definition of capital, as well as rules on banks' liquidity … Especially, the issue of systemic risk is on the table. Treating it with a new overhead capital which would apply to larger institutions would be a grave error when they enter an area unreasonable, in which those banks could no longer fulfill their mission of financing the economy. In my view, the systemic risk is an approach which should focus particularly on the organization, transparency and market surveillance. On all these subjects, the French banks remain extremely vigilant and mobilized. With a strong message with regard to capital: that will do!
Last Monday, bank shares have risen sharply in stock. The markets seemed relieved.Are not you exaggerating the impact of Basel 3?
Let us not focus too much on daily changes fast cash loans. More fundamentally, the markets had anticipated a large part of the new rules. In any event, we can not say that imposing 7% minimum capital ratio for banks, this is nothing! We were right to call the attention of authorities and public opinion affect the growth of this reform. The companies also say the same thing as us. Never forget that in France, banks provide three quarters of the financing of the economy.
Do you fear a tax credit?
A tax credit included in the draft state budget for 2011. Other European countries like Germany or the United Kingdom, have indicated they would create their own tax. I would like to mention three things of common sense. First, remember that tax the banks is tax credit, therefore the economy.Next, note that the bank support plan has not cost the French state, on the contrary, this is not the case in other countries where a tax credit is created. Finally, ensure that the tax, if there is tax does not disadvantage the French banks compared to foreign competitors, since all countries have no tax.
Georges Pauget and Emmanuel Constans have been handed a report on the pricing practices which is the basis for further negotiations between banks, government and consumers. Your profession has more work to do …
This report has the merit of presenting a global approach. He recalled that the question of rates can not be separated from the overall relationship model, and near the French credit institutions maintain with their customers.He also noted that the bank charges in France compare quite favorably to the practices of other major European countries. However, we can still make progress in terms of tariff transparency, clarity of information given to the client, avoiding incidents that bank must be able to anticipate. And if there are abuses in pricing, we must correct them. We have made concrete proposals. For example, we propose that each bank publishes the tariffs of the ten most common banking services, the list is the same for everyone. We would also, along with a detailed description of the package the most common.Other proposals are now on the table of the Minister, for example to limit the price of payment incidents for the most vulnerable customers.
If you had set a goal for your year as president of the FBF, what would it be?
Convinced that French banks are in the service economy. The crisis has been able to raise doubts, because it revealed here and there risk taking reckless, very far from their funding mission. In some countries, banks have put their economies to its knees.In France, no bank has fallen, much better, French banks have continued to do their job during the crisis: France is one of the few European countries where, in 2009 in the heart of the crisis, stocks loans have increased while the economy was in recession.
ALSO READ:
"The banks have their accounts
"The new standards imposed on banks
"The banks will have to raise 150 billion euros
"The tax credit would bring several billion
"The bank charges increasingly exorbitant