World News, Financial News, Breaking US News

Air France-KLM fails to emerge from the fog in which she sailed past four quarters. The airline announced on Wednesday a further loss in the third quarter of fiscal shifted 2009-2010, the fifth in a row. Over this period (October to December), the group garnered a net loss of 295 million euros. This is less than the 508 million the previous year but well above the 216 million expected by analysts. The operating loss also disappointed expectations, to -245 to -194 million against expected by the market.

In the third quarter, revenue fell 16% to 5.19 billion euros. Observers had expected 5.34 billion euros."The business has shown during this quarter are some signs of recovery but in an economic environment that remains challenging," the group said in a statement.

Operating loss record throughout the year

For more, Air France KLM expects operating profit in the fourth quarter of fiscal offset "the same as that of last year" was 574 million euros. This "given the expected recovery later in unit revenues, lower capacity and an increase of about 300 million dollars from the oil bill.

This means that at this rate, the operating loss over the whole year could reach a record. Indeed, nine months, the group's operating loss amounted already to 788 million euros.Adding to the loss of 574 million harvested in the fourth quarter, the operating loss over the entire year could exceed 1.3 billion euros.

In a more distant future, Air France-KLM confirms targeting a return to balanced operations for its fiscal year 2010-11, excluding the impact of oil hedges prior to 2009. The company relies on cost reductions, "expected a slight increase in unit revenues, the implementation of medium-haul product and restructuring initiated in cargo activity.

The general environment is showing signs of improvement in the airline also confirmed the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The situation could hardly be worse than in 2009.

ALSO READ:

The passenger traffic of Air France back again in January

The device of "breaking conventional" – that allows an employer and his employee to terminate a permanent contract by mutual agreement, limiting litigation and providing access to unemployment benefits – has confirmed its success in 2009. For the full year, the first full implementation since its entry into force in August 2008, 191 309 amicable separations were approved by the Department of Labor. This represents nearly 8% of ILC failures recorded in 2009. "This system has put an end to hypocrisy that was to dress up as desired redundancies departures by both parties for the sole purpose of enabling the employee to receive unemployment insurance, welcomes it does in the entourage Xavier Darcos, Minister of Labor. He is entered in the customs and found its stride. "Either 20 000 applications, more or less approved by months.

"If we better secure the release of the company to an employee by guaranteeing a minimum benefit equal to redundancy pay, that's something," says Marcel Grignard, number 2 of the CFDT, the one of four unions to have invented the employers with the device in January 2008.

The refusal rate (records released by the administration in particular for non-compliance with statutory time limits) reached 13% in 2009 and that of inadmissibility (for incomplete), 3%. Two proportions in sharp decline over the year, indicating a greater ownership of the device by the Department of Human Resources. Some companies however are still aligned for their applications because of "social disguise" – a true social costs more than adding individual separations. It's mishap occurred in December to IBM online payday advance .The direction of the work of the Hauts-de-Seine has refused registration of 12 cases in the month. According to Jean-Michel Daire, CFDT delegate the administration would still accept applications in February reformulated by the group.

"It does not attend mass flow diversion" into perspective does one Department of Labor, which has yet sent in March 2009 a serious warning to its officials. They were advised to be "vigilant breaks conventional concluded in order to circumvent the safeguards of redundancies and collective."

Strong rise in entries to employment center

Virginie Devos, a lawyer in employment law in August & Debouzy, confirms: "Some enterprises are abusing the conventional break knowing they are likely to overturn." But others are more reluctant to use them."Some employers do not want to sign a treaty breaks because they fear a ripple effect among their employees more and more people want to benefit and reluctant to resign," says she.

Latest Trend: More and more employees enroll in employment center after signing a separation amicably. They have been 128 696 in 2009 to cross the gates of the former ANPE, or 67% of recipients of rupture. A steadily rising level which was close to 80% in December. This implies that, despite the crisis, employees are increasingly likely to take the gamble to leave the company immediately without having another job.

ALSO READ:

"CDI: breaks amicably fly

"Breaks amicably: beware of disguised layoffs

The time of discord between Cadbury and Kraft Foods U.S. suitor would be gone. The BBC and The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that even the banns could be published on Tuesday. An agreement had indeed been found between the two groups on the basis of an offer revalorized Kraft Foods.

The amount of this new proposal to be about 19 billion dollars, according to the U.S. economic daily, citing sources familiar with the matter. The British radio advance estimates of the same order.It expects an offer increased to 850 pence per share, at most, on the recovery of Cadbury at 11.7 billion pounds, or 13.3 billion euros, equivalent to 19.148 billion dollars at current exchange rates of one euro to 1.4397 dollars.

Based on closing prices Friday, the previous offer of Kraft, open until February 2, Cadbury valued at 10.5 billion pounds, about 12 billion euros or 17.2 billion dollars. Kraft Foods has finally decided to upgrade its offer in response to rumors of interest from the U.S. confectioner Hershey. British law gave him until Tuesday, January 19 to change the amount of its proposal.

"Cadbury: Ferrero abandons

"The UK revival of economic patriotism

"Kraft / Cadbury:" yes, but "in Brussels

Now that the reform of business tax is completed, the government will tackle, in January, a new project: the revision of rental values. These rental values are "administered" price of a home or business premises, prices of base used to calculate local taxes. Since they have not been revised since 1970, today they are disconnected from reality. Result: an inhabitant of a building of faded 1960s pay for the same area, more housing tax or property tax that a household living in an old building, dilapidated forty years ago but now renovated. An updating of rental values would end these inequities. But the losers – typically, the people of downtown – could see their local taxes rise by 50%!

Companies are not immune to these distortions."In our barometer for the property tax offices in Boulogne-Billancourt is a city that offers the tax rate the lowest among major cities (except Paris). But it appears 35th on the total cost of fees per square meter, due to higher rental values, "explains Pascal Martinet, director of tax audits of Alma Consulting Group, a consulting firm.

Revision of rental values, however, looks less sensitive to process for companies, because these do not vote. Precisely, the Budget Ministry, Eric Woerth, in charge of this matter, decided to tackle the reform starting with the company. "The dated nature of the bases is more strongly for local business," says his entourage.But the idea is mainly to see what happens revision bases for some 4 million of commercial premises, before launching a big bang about 32 million homes inhabited by the French.

Involve local and parliamentary

Gilles Carrez, the UMP rapporteur of the Committee on Finance of the Assembly, calls for a long time for this method in two stages. In contrast, Jean Arthuis, the centrist chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, was opposed: "If the rental values no longer follow the same rules must be applied to property tax rates for different individuals and companies." At Bercy, we judge that this is not a problem.

Specifically, the Budget Ministry has put in place by January of working groups composed of members of associations of local elected officials, parliamentarians and government officials. "We did not set deadlines for completion.Everything depends on the speed of the consultation. We have no preconceived ideas on how to use ", said the entourage of Eric Woerth. In fact, the options are many. The leasehold basis can be stowed on the market value or remain an administrative prices set by the Treasury. The revision of bases may occur at the same date for all buildings in France or locally, by local, when a sale. Another option: the mayors may have liberty to set the timing of revision.

Finally, the impact of revisions will probably be spread over time to smooth the impact to taxpayers.

"Taxes geometry varies

"Rents: new coverage for owners

After several weeks of reflection, the verdict has finally fallen on the new method of fixing gas prices. The Ministry of Economy, which was to maneuver, just send the document to refer to the Regulatory Commission of Energy (CRE), for entry under the next year, after the publication of a decree .

The government, which ruled until then every three months on possible changes in gas prices, trying to remove a little of the game, at least in appearance. It will no longer once per year, one component of overall framing of the price curve of the molecule. This scheme seeks to prevent the State to meet in full psychodrama whenever Bercy opts for a rise in gas prices.

So now the company, GDF Suez, which will seize the regulator for a rate increase.Which regulator, after watching whether the incumbent's request is consistent with the pricing formula, make a binding opinion. Until now, the opinion of the CRE in the record setting gas prices was only advisory. In the new scheme, the Commission will therefore pose a greater weight.

However, uncertainties remain. In particular, what happens if gas prices are indexed on oil prices should fall? In the reference document, it is not called GDF Suez to decide in what direction. Similarly, it does not ask the regulator to pressure the company to obtain a reduction in charges.

"Let's just common sense: since oil prices are public, they bend permanently, GDF Suez will be forced to seek lower fares.Or the group will draw the wrath of both consumers and government, "says an industry expert.

Psychodrama

So much for the new scheme, at least in theory, developed by the government with the approval of other partners, beginning with GDF Suez. It remains now to see how it will apply in practice. It is hard, in fact, the government remain inactive in the face several repeated hikes in gas prices. Especially during elections, where the energy bill is regularly found in the heart of debates.

In short, despite government efforts, it is feared that this new device does not put an end to psychodramas on gas prices.